Search catalog

Knorr Passato di 10 verdure Knorr · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:Moderate signal

Knorr Passato di 10 verdure Knorr

Name: Knorr Passato di 10 verdure Knorr
Brand: Knorr
SKU: 2000000061675

The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA4

Lisaained:0 lisaainet

Andmete katvus:61%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (40 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition score67/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Acqua, Verdure 44,7 % (patate* 13 %, sedano rapa* 6,7 %, cipolle* 5,6 %, fagiolini* 4,8 %, broccoli* 4,5 %, porri* 4 %, spinaci* 2,4 %. crescione* 2 %, carote* 1,6 %, acetosa 0,1 %), Piante aromatiche (cerfoglio* 0,3 %, basilico* 0,1 %), Amido di mais, Patate* in fiocchi, Sale, Zucchero, Latticello in polvere, Olio di girasole, Estratto di lievito, Aromi,

Product & Packaging

CategoryPassato Di Verdure Pronto

Label information quality72/100

Data confidence

Quantity500 ml

PackagingTetra Pak

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Nutrition score

67/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 67/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Medium reliability

medium5/5 kontrollitud

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

67/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

72/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (40 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, nutrition panel, and front image. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

DimmidiSì

Passato di verdure DimmidiSì

Passato Di Verdure Pronto. Ingredients: verdure (ortaggi in proporzione variabile: patate, carote, zucchine, porri, fagiolini, erbette, verze, spinaci), acqua, piselli, olio extravergine di oliva, olio di semi di girasole, sale.. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreBNOVA3Passato Di Verdure Pronto

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Pam

Passato di verdure Pam i Tesori

Passato Di Verdure Pronto. Ingredients: Verdure 49% (ortaggi in proporzione variabile: patate, carote, zucchine, porri, fagiolini, erbette, verze, spinaci), acqua, piselli, olio extravergine di oliva, olio di semi di girasole, sale.. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreBNOVA3Well-documented label

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Open Food Facts

Passato di verdure Zerbinati

Passato Di Verdure Pronto. Ingredients: Ortaggi 56% in proporzione variabile (carote, zucchine, sedano, patate, verze, spinaci, cipolle, porri), Acqua, Olio extravergine di oliva 2%, Piselli , Sale,. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreBNOVA3Well-documented label

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (40 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition score67/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Product & Packaging

CategoryPassato Di Verdure Pronto

Label information quality72/100

Data confidence

Quantity500 ml

PackagingTetra Pak

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Nutrition score

67/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 67/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Medium reliability

medium5/5 kontrollitud

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

67/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

72/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (40 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Knorr Passato di 10 verdure Knorr

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 67/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Passato di verdure DimmidiSì

Passato di verdure Pam i Tesori

Passato di verdure Zerbinati

Knorr Passato di 10 verdure Knorr

Similar options worth comparing

Passato di verdure DimmidiSì

Passato di verdure Pam i Tesori

Passato di verdure Zerbinati

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 67/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Environmental Impact

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs