Name: Open Food Facts Trecciamore 5 cereali Bauli
Brand: Open Food Facts
SKU: 2000000060364

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryGrains

Label information quality72/100

Data confidence

Quantityconfezione da 252 g contenente 6 porzioni

PackagingPlastica

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition score35/100 · Grade E

Ingredient-level explanation

Farina di grano tenero, margarina vegetale (grasso di palma, acqua, olio di girasole), lievito naturale (frumento), pasta d’arancia candita (12%) (scorze di arance italiane, sciroppo di glucosio-fruttosio, zucchero), uova fresche, zucchero, granella di zucchero di decorazione (6,5%), farina 5 cereali (2,9%) (avena, riso, orzo, farro (grano), grano saraceno), emulsionanti: mono-e digliceridi degli acidi grassi, zucchero grezzo di canna (1,1%), latte scremato in polvere, burro, yogurt in polvere, sale, aromi, farina d’orzo maltato, proteine del latte.

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 35/100

Weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Data confidence 63/100

Medium reliability

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.

Nutrition profile

Weak

35/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Quite good

66/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

72/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (51 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, nutrition panel, and front image. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Conad Treccine di pasta sfoglia Conad

Grains. Ingredients: Farina di frumento, lievito madre naturale, pasta d’arancia candita 12% (scorze d’arancia, sciroppo di glucosio-fruttosio, zucchero), uova, zucchero, acqua, zucchero in cristalli 7%, olio di girasole, burro, emulsionanti: mono - e digliceridi degli acidi grassi; lievito di birra, latte scremato in polvere, yogurt intero in polvere, sale, aromi. Evidence quality: medium

38/100

nutrition score

Grains

Score summary

Nutrition score

Weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

66/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

Weak

38/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Quite good

66/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

72/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Conad Treccine di pasta sfoglia Conad

38/100

nutrition score

Grains

Score summary

Nutrition score

Weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

66/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

Weak

38/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Quite good

66/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

72/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryGrains

Label information quality72/100

Data confidence

Quantityconfezione da 252 g contenente 6 porzioni

PackagingPlastica

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition score35/100 · Grade E

Ingredient-level explanation

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 35/100

Weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Data confidence 63/100

Medium reliability

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.

Nutrition profile

Weak

35/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Quite good

66/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

72/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (51 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Open Food Facts Trecciamore 5 cereali Bauli

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 35/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Conad Treccine di pasta sfoglia Conad

Open Food Facts Trecciamore 5 cereali Bauli

Similar options worth comparing

Conad Treccine di pasta sfoglia Conad

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 35/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs