Vitaline Vitaline Muesli cacao · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Vitaline Vitaline Muesli cacao

Name: Vitaline Vitaline Muesli cacao
Brand: Vitaline
SKU: 2000000048044

The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition interpretation

Low signal

The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives More from Vitaline Suggest correction

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (64 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryRepas A Boire

Label information quality79/100

Data confidence

Quantity450 ml

PackagingPlastique, Bouteille

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition score73/100 · Grade A

Ingredient-level explanation

Flocons d'avoine* (sans gluten), lin jaune*, farine de sarrasin*, mélange d'huiles* en poudre (tournesol oléique*, colza*, lin* ; support : sirop de manioc non raffiné*, fibres d'acacia* ; antioxydant : extrait naturel de romarin*), protéines de lait* (origine : Suisse), sirop de manioc non raffiné*, cacao* 7%, agave*, lait de coco*, protéines de pois*, maca*, sel de Guérande, baies d'açaï*, lithothamne, acérola*, moringa*, carottes*, roucou*, son de riz*, feuilles de curry*, basilic*, citrons*, épinards*, persil*, amla*, thé vert*, shitake*, lichens*, spiruline*, antioxydant : extrait naturel de romarin*.

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 73/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Data confidence 73/100

Medium reliability

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

73/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

51/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

79/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (64 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, and nutrition panel. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Vitaline Vitaline Recover Butternut

Repas A Boire. Ingredients: Protéines de lait bio (origine : Suisse), butternut (14,1 g), extrait de manioc bio, farine de sarrasin bio, farine de châtaigne bio, lin jaune bio, huile de tournesol oléique, protéines de pois bio, oignon bio (4,5 g), agave bio, malate de citrulline (2 g), lait de coco bio, maca bio, BCAA (L-Leucine (500 mg), L-Isoleucine (250 mg), L-Valine (250 mg)), créatine (1 g), curcuma bio, baies d'açaï bio, extraits et concentrés de fruits et légumes (extraits végétaux titrés en polyphénols : thé vert 69 mg, pépins et marc de raisin 30 mg ; concentrés de fruits et légumes 105 mg : myrtille, carotte, pamplemousse, papaye, ananas, fraise, pomme, abricot, cerise, orange, tomate, cassis, brocoli, chou vert, oignon, ail, asperge, concombre), lactose, spiruline bio, chlorella bio, antioxydant : extrait naturel de romarin bio, poivre noir bio, probiotiques. Mix de vitamines : A, B2, B3, B5, B6, B8, B9, C (acérola), D3, K2. Mix de minéraux : chlorure de sodium, chlorure de potassium, citrate de fer, gluconate de zinc, iodure de potassium, molybdate de sodium, sélénite de sodium, chlorure de chrome.. Evidence quality: medium

73/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelRepas A Boire

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

74/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

73/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Vitaline Vitaline Recover Pomme

Repas A Boire. Ingredients: Flocons d'avoine bio, protéines de lait bio, betterave (8,8 g), pomme bio (5,2 g), huile de tournesol oléique, protéines de pois bio, farine de noix de coco bio, agave bio, lait de coco, graines de lin jaune bio, farine de sarrasin bio, malate de citrulline (2 g), curcuma bio (1,2 g), L-Leucine (750 mg), L-Valine (375 mg), L-Isoleucine (375 mg), maca bio, créatine (1g), baies d'açaï bio, extraits et concentrés de fruits et légumes (thé vert, raisin rouge et blanc, myrtille, carotte, pamplemousse, papaye, ananas, fraise, pomme, abricot, cerise, orange, brocoli, chou vert, oignon, ail, cassis, asperge, tomate, olive, concombre), lactose, spiruline bio, chlorella bio, extrait naturel de romarin bio, poivre noir bio, probiotiques. Mix de minéraux : chlorure de sodium, chlorure de chrome, chlorure de potassium, citrate trimagnésium, molybdate de sodium, iodure de potassium, pyrophosphate de fer, gluconate de zinc. Evidence quality: high

56/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

78/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Mixed

56/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (64 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryRepas A Boire

Label information quality79/100

Data confidence

Quantity450 ml

PackagingPlastique, Bouteille

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition score73/100 · Grade A

Ingredient-level explanation

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 73/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Data confidence 73/100

Medium reliability

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

73/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

51/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

79/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (64 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Similar options worth comparing

Vitaline Vitaline Recover Butternut

73/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelRepas A Boire

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

74/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

73/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Vitaline Vitaline Recover Pomme

56/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

78/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Mixed

56/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Vitaline Vitaline Muesli cacao

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 73/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Vitaline Vitaline Recover Butternut

Vitaline Vitaline Recover Pomme

Vitaline Vitaline Muesli cacao

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 73/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Vitaline Vitaline Recover Butternut

Vitaline Vitaline Recover Pomme

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs