Search catalog

Atria Metsästäjänpihvi sienikastikkeella · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:Moderate signal

Atria Metsästäjänpihvi sienikastikkeella

Name: Atria Metsästäjänpihvi sienikastikkeella
Brand: Atria
SKU: 14278662

The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA4

Lisaained:1 tk

Andmete katvus:68%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (71 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Energy / 100g

141 kcal

Protein / 100g

6.2 g

Sugar / 100g

2.2 g

Nutrition score60/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Kermaperunat 44 % (peruna, vesi, ruokakerma (9 %), maitojauhe, muunnettu maissitärkkelys, jodioitu suola, dekstroosi, mausteet (mm. valkopippuri), aromit), jauhelihapihvi 33 % (liha (viljaporsas, nauta), vesi, soijaproteiinivalmiste, perunajauho, pekonií (viljaporsaanliha, dekstroosi, säilöntäaine natriumnitriitti), mausteet (mm. korianteri, paprika), korppujauho (vehnä), jodioitu suola, dekstroosi, aromit, vehnäkuitu, savuaromi, herneproteiini. Jauhelihapihvin lihapitoisuus 53 %. Viljaporsaan - ja naudanlihan alkuperä Suomi.), sienikastike 23% (vesi, säilykesieni 4% (haapa - ja kangasrousku, herkkusieni, osterivinokas), ruokakerma, muunnettu maissitärkkelys, sipuli, auringonkukkaöljy, jodioitu suola, aromit, mausteet, dekstroosi).

Tuvastatud lisaained (1)

E250

Product & Packaging

CategoryValmisruoka

Label information quality71/100

Data confidence

Quantity350 g

OriginsSuomi

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Nutrition score

60/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 60/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Medium reliability

medium5/5 kontrollitud

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

60/100

Nutrition score based on nutrient profile only.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Quite good

60/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

71/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (71 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Record completeness is 78%.
Impact: medium
Image evidence covers about 0% of the key fields.
Impact: low

Some source data is incomplete for this product: front image. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Atria

Kanafileetä paprikavoilla ja paahdetut kasvikset

Valmisruoka. Ingredients: Kypsiä kasviksia 39 % (porkkana, palsternakka, parsakaali, rypsiöljy), maustetut perunat 37 % (peruna, merisuola, mausteet (mm. paprika, chili, juusto - kumina, kumina, valkosipuli), rypsiöljy, aromi (paprika)], broilerin fileeviipale 20% (broilerin filee, vesi, jodioitu suola, stabilointiaineet (E 450, E 451), dekstroosi. Broilerinlihan alkuperä Suomi. Kasvatusaikana ei ole käytetty antibiootteja), maustevoi 4% [laktoositon voi, paprika, mausteet (mm. paprika, valkosipuli, chili), suola). Sisältää kasviksia 38 % ja perunaa 36 %.. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Signal classes

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (71 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Energy / 100g

141 kcal

Protein / 100g

6.2 g

Sugar / 100g

2.2 g

Nutrition score60/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Tuvastatud lisaained (1)

E250

Product & Packaging

CategoryValmisruoka

Label information quality71/100

Data confidence

Quantity350 g

OriginsSuomi

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Nutrition score

60/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 60/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Medium reliability

medium5/5 kontrollitud

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

60/100

Nutrition score based on nutrient profile only.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Quite good

60/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

71/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (71 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Record completeness is 78%.
Impact: medium
Image evidence covers about 0% of the key fields.
Impact: low

Some source data is incomplete for this product: front image. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Töödeldud lihatooted ja nitritid
Tugevam hoiatus
Töödeldud lihatooted ja nitriti/nitraadi markerid viitavad kõrgema ettevaatuse vajadusele.
Kohe
Võib suurendada soola- ja säilitusainete koormust ühes toidukorras.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsatele pikaajalistele tervisenäitajatele.
Ettevaatus: kõrgeTõenduse tase: tugevSihtrühm: lapsed ja täiskasvanudAllikas: kombineeritud tuvastus
Loogika: Kategooria viitab töödeldud lihale või koostises/additiivides leidub E249, E250, E251, E252.
Signaalid: Leitud nitriti/nitraadi lisandikoodid: E250.
See signaal ei asenda personaalset nõustamist. Tõlgendus sõltub tarbimissagedusest ja portsjoni suurusest.
Madal kiudainesisaldus ja rafineeritud süsivesikud
Ettevaatlikkus
Madal kiudainesisaldus ja rafineeritud süsivesikud viitavad toidule, mis toetab nõrgemalt täiskõhutunnet.
Kohe
Võib põhjustada kiiremat glükoosikõikumist ja varasemat näljatunnet.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine võib halvendada üldist toidukvaliteeti ja seostub ebasoodsama ainevahetusprofiiliga.
Ettevaatus: mõõdukasTõenduse tase: mõõdukasSihtrühm: lapsed ja täiskasvanudAllikas: kombineeritud tuvastus
Loogika: fiber100g < 1.5 g/100 g või fiber100g < 3 g/100 g koos rafineeritud süsivesikute markeritega.
Signaalid: Kiudained 1.1 g/100 g jäävad alla üldlävendi 3 g/100 g. · Kiudainesisaldus jääb alla tugeva riskisignaali lävendi 1.5 g/100 g.
Riskisignaal sõltub kogu menüü kiudainete tasemest, mitte ainult ühest tootest.
Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)
Ettevaatlikkus
NOVA 4 viitab ulatuslikule tööstuslikule töötlemisele ja suuremale formulatsiooni keerukusele.
Kohe
Võib soodustada ülesöömist, sest maitse- ja tekstuuriprofiil on sageli väga stimuleeriv.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsatele tervisetulemitele, kuid mõju sõltub toitumismustrist.
Ettevaatus: mõõdukasTõenduse tase: mõõdukasSihtrühm: lapsed ja täiskasvanudAllikas: töötlusklass
Loogika: novaGroup === 4.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud klass).
NOVA klass on tarbimismustri signaal ega tähenda üksiku toote põhjal automaatset diagnoosi.

Atria Metsästäjänpihvi sienikastikkeella

Nutrient profile

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 60/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Kanafileetä paprikavoilla ja paahdetut kasvikset

Atria Metsästäjänpihvi sienikastikkeella

Similar options worth comparing

Kanafileetä paprikavoilla ja paahdetut kasvikset

Nutrient profile

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 60/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Environmental Impact

What lowers the rating

Töödeldud lihatooted ja nitritid

Madal kiudainesisaldus ja rafineeritud süsivesikud

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Madal kiudainesisaldus ja rafineeritud süsivesikud

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs