Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
33
/100
Nutrition interpretation
High signal
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Roasted almonds (almonds, salt), Roasted cashews (cashews, canola oil*, salt), Dried cranberries (cranberries, sugar*, sunflower oil), Yogurt chips (sugar*, palm kernel oil, whey powder, skim milk powder, yogurt powder [whey, skim milk, bacterial culture], lactic acid, soy lecithin*), Dried blueberries (blueberries, sugar*, sunflower oil). Contains: Almonds, Cashews, Milk, Soy. May contain: Wheat, Eggs, Peanuts, Other tree nuts, Gluten, Sesame.
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
33
/100
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
Data confidence 83/100
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.
Nutrition profile
Weak
33/100
33
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Very highly processed
Very highly processed
12
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
57
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
88/100
88
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Formulation markers such as letsitiin support a more processed classification.
Impact: low
A long ingredient list (34 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Related products
Trail Mix. Ingredients: Dried Cranberries (cranberries, sugar, vegetable oil (sunflower and/or canola oils)), Peanuts (peanuts, vegetable oil (canola, peanut, and/or cottonseed oils), salt), Raisins (raisins, sunflower oil), Walnuts. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
45
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
81/100
high reliability
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Trail Mix. Evidence quality: low. Nutrition score is currently hidden
nutrition score
Score summary
—
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
42/100
low reliability
Trail Mix. Ingredients: Peanuts, Peanut oil, Salt, Raisins, Raisins, Sunflower oil, Almonds, Almonds, Canola oil or peanut oil, Salt, Cashews, Cashews, Peanut oil, Salt, M&M'S® Milk Chocolate Candies: Milk chocolate (sugar, cocoa mass, milk ingredients, cocoa butter, lactose, soy lecithin, salt, artificial flavour, flavour), Sugars (sugar, corn syrup), Cornstarch, Tapioca dextrin, Carnauba wax, Modified coconut oil and/or modified palm oil (medium chain triglycerides), Gum acacia, Titanium dioxide, Brilliant blue FCF, Sunset yellow FCF, Allura red, Tartrazine, Indigotine, M&M'S® Peanut Milk Chocolate Candies: Milk chocolate (sugar, cocoa mass, milk ingredients, cocoa butter, lactose, soy lecithin, salt, artificial flavour, flavour), Sugars (sugar, corn syrup), Peanuts, Cornstarch, Palm oil, Tapioca dextrin, Carnauba wax, Modified coconut oil and/or modified palm oil (medium chain triglycerides), Gum acacia, Titanium dioxide, Brilliant blue FCF, Allura red, Sunset yellow FCF, Tartrazine, Indigotine, Contains: Peanuts, Almonds, Cashews, Soy, Milk. May contain: Wheat, Other tree nuts. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
38
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
81/100
high reliability
NOVA 4 viitab ulatuslikule tööstuslikule töötlemisele ja suuremale formulatsiooni keerukusele.
Kohe
Võib soodustada ülesöömist, sest maitse- ja tekstuuriprofiil on sageli väga stimuleeriv.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsatele tervisetulemitele, kuid mõju sõltub toitumismustrist.
Loogika: novaGroup === 4.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud klass).
NOVA klass on tarbimismustri signaal ega tähenda üksiku toote põhjal automaatset diagnoosi.
Ultra-töödeldud märge aitab vanemal hinnata, kas toode sobib igapäevaseks valikuks või pigem harvemaks.
Miks oluline
Rakendus kuvab selle lisakontekstina, et toetada lapse menüü üldist kvaliteeti, mitte anda mustvalget otsust ühe toote kohta.
Kohe
Võib tekkida kiire söömise ja varasema uue isu muster.
Pikemas vaates
Sage kasutus võib nihutada menüüd vähem täisväärtusliku toiduprofiili poole.
Põhineb peamiselt epidemioloogilisel ja institutsionaalsel kirjandusel ultra-töödeldud toitude tarbimismustrite kohta.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud profiil).
low confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage