Fine Foods Of America Inc. Fine Vines, Black Truffle Artisanal Ketchup · Nutrisiq

Fine Foods Of America Inc. Fine Vines, Black Truffle Artisanal Ketchup · Nutrisiq

Signal classes

Need attention

High sugar content (22.22 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Added sugars are unavailable, so sugar handling relies conservatively on total sugars.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (17 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Need attention

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).

Supporting factors

Declared Eco-Score B supports the environmental indicator.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryCondiments

Label information quality63/100

Data confidence

67

Ownership

Processing

Highly processed

Formulation complexity

51

Environmental signal

80

NOVA groupNOVA 3

Performance

Energy / 100g

139 kcal

Protein / 100g

5.5600000000000005 g

Sugar / 100g

22.22 g

Nutrition score55/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Tomato paste, brown sugar, apple cider vinegar, water, snaked sea salt with black truffle (sea salt, black treffie ) spices.

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

55

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 55/100

Mixed

environmental signal is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Environmental signal

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Data confidence 67/100

Medium reliability

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.

Nutrition profile

Mixed

55/100

55

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Highly processed

Highly processed

34

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Strong

80/100

80

Product-specific environmental signal.

Label quality

Quite good

63/100

63

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Declared Eco-Score B supports the environmental indicator.
Impact: high

Pulls the score down

High sugar content (22.22 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: high
Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium

Uncertain area

Record completeness is 56%.
Impact: medium
Image evidence covers about 0% of the key fields.
Impact: low
Added sugars are unavailable, so sugar handling relies conservatively on total sugars.
Impact: low

Some source data is incomplete for this product: saturated fat per 100g, fiber per 100g, quantity, allergens, and front image. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Related products

Similar options worth comparing

Open Food Facts Fleur de sel nature packshot

Open Food Facts Fleur de sel nature

Condiments. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden

—

nutrition score

Lower processing burdenCondiments

Score summary

—

Nutrition score

No reliable assessment

processing is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.

Strongest: ProcessingWeakest: Environmental signal

Data confidence

72/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

—

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Moderately processed

Moderately processed

67

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

57

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

67/100

67

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

Open Food Facts Sel rose de l'himalaya packshot

Open Food Facts Sel rose de l'himalaya

Condiments. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden

—

nutrition score

Lower processing burdenCondiments

Score summary

—

Nutrition score

No reliable assessment

processing is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.

Strongest: ProcessingWeakest: Environmental signal

Data confidence

74/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

—

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Moderately processed

Moderately processed

67

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

57

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

67/100

67

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Open Food Facts Sel rose de l'himalaya packshot

Open Food Facts Sel rose de l'himalaya

Condiments. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden

—

nutrition score

Lower processing burdenCondiments

Score summary

—

Nutrition score

No reliable assessment

processing is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.

Strongest: ProcessingWeakest: Environmental signal

Data confidence

74/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

—

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Moderately processed

Moderately processed

67

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

57

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

67/100

67

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Open Food Facts Pesto packshot

Open Food Facts Pesto

Condiments. Evidence quality: medium

15/100

nutrition score

Condiments

Score summary

15

Nutrition score

Very weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Nutrition profile

Data confidence

72/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

Very weak

15/100

15

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Processing unknown

Insufficient evidence

—

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

57

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

67/100

67

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.