What would improve the assessment
- Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.
Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
71
/100
Nutrition interpretation
Low signal
The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Energy / 100g
42 kcal
Protein / 100g
0.42 g
Sugar / 100g
8.44 g
Ingredient-level explanation
Water, yerba mate tea*, evaporated cane juice*1, agave*1, lemon juice concentrate*, hot ginger flavor*.
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
71
/100
Nutrition profile
nutrition profile is the strongest signal right now, while label quality needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Nutrition profile
Weakest area
Label quality
Data confidence
low
Data confidence
Data confidence 43/100
Low reliability
Data coverage is limited and the result should be interpreted with caution.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.
Nutrition profile
Quite good
71/100
71
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Moderately processed
Moderately processed · Limited estimate
67
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
57
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Mixed
56/100
56
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
Data is limited. The result should be treated as an initial indication rather than a final assessment.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Pulls the score down
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (50%).
Impact: medium
Uncertain area
Record completeness is 22%.
Impact: medium
The processing indicator is inferred rather than declared directly.
Impact: low
Image evidence covers about 0% of the key fields.
Impact: low
Kofeiin ja muud stimulandid võivad mõjutada erksust, und ja pulssi, eriti suuremas koguses.
Kohe
Võib põhjustada rahutust, südamekloppimist või uinumisraskust, eriti tundlikel kasutajatel ja lastel.
Pikemas vaates
Sage suurtes kogustes tarbimine võib halvendada une kvaliteeti ja soodustada ebasoodsat tarbimismustrit.
Loogika: Koostises tuvastatakse kofeiin/stimulant või kategooria viitab energy_drink tüübile.
Signaalid: Leitud stimulantide markerid: mate ekstrakt.
Laste puhul on ettevaatus enamasti rangem. Mõju sõltub annusest, ajastusest ja individuaalsest tundlikkusest.
Kofeiini ja energiajoogi signaal kuvatakse lapse puhul kõrge prioriteediga, sest see võib häirida und ja päevast enesetunnet.
Miks oluline
Vanema jaoks on see praktiline otsusetugi: isegi väike kogus võib lapse puhul väärida tähelepanu, eriti õhtuse tarbimise korral.
Kohe
Võimalik on rahutus, uinumise pikenemine või unekvaliteedi langus samal päeval.
Pikemas vaates
Võib soodustada ebasoodsat uneharjumust ja toetada stimulandipõhist tarbimismustrit.
Põhineb institutsionaalsel riskihinnangul: EFSA kofeiinikäsitlus ning pediaatrilised soovitused energiajoogi ettevaatlikuks käsitluseks.
Signaalid: Leitud kofeiini/stimulandi markerid: mate ekstrakt.