Enlightened Enlightened Light Salted caramel cookie · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Enlightened Enlightened Light Salted caramel cookie

Name: Enlightened Enlightened Light Salted caramel cookie
Brand: Enlightened
SKU: 0852109331789

The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition interpretation

Low signal

The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives More from Enlightened Suggest correction

Signal classes

Supporting factors

Fiber (8 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (2 markers) support a more processed classification.
Formulation markers such as karamellvärv, guarkummi support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (31 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryEmpty

Label information quality64/100

Data confidence

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

100

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Energy / 100g

130 kcal

Protein / 100g

6 g

Sugar / 100g

7 g

Nutrition score71/100 · Grade B

Ingredient-level explanation

Skim milk, milk protein isolate, erythritol (natural sweetener), non-gmo soluble corn fiber, cream, cane sugar, contains 2% or less of: vegetable glycerin, butter, natural flavor, carob gum, guar gum, salt, monk fruit extract, pectin, citric acid, baking soda, caramel color, malic acid, disodium phosphate.

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 71/100

Quite good

nutrition profile is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Nutrition profile

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Data confidence 63/100

Medium reliability

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

71/100

Nutrition score based on nutrient profile only.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

64/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Fiber (8 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (2 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
Formulation markers such as karamellvärv, guarkummi support a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Record completeness is 56%.
Impact: medium
Image evidence covers about 0% of the key fields.
Impact: low

Some source data is incomplete for this product: quantity and front image. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Fresh & Easy Hot & Spicy Chicken Chunks

Empty. Ingredients: Cream, milk, sugar, roasted almonds(almonds, safflower oil, butter, salt), marshmallows(corn syrup, sugar, modified corn starch, gelatin, tetrasodium pyrophosphate), cocoa(processed with alkali), egg yolk, carob bean gum, guar gum.. Evidence quality: high

67/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

79/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

67/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

80/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Quest Nutrition Llc Protein Bar

Empty. Ingredients: Protein blend (whey protein isolate, milk protein isolate), isomalto-oligosaccharides* (prebiotic fiber), almonds, water, erythritol, walnuts, dried bananas. Contains less than 2% of the following: sea salt, cinnamon, steviol glycosides (stevia), natural flavors.. Evidence quality: medium

76/100

nutrition score

Balanced nutritionEmpty

Score summary

Nutrition score

Strong

nutrition profile is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Nutrition profileWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

71/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

Strong

76/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

66/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Thrive Frozen Nutrition Inc Ice Cream

Empty. Ingredients: Water, cream, maltitol*, milk proteins sorbitol*, inulin, polydextrose, vitamins & minerals (dimagnesium phosphate, tricalcium phosphate chloride, dipotassium phosphate, ferric oxide, niacinamide, d-calcium pantothenate, manganese sulfate, vitamin a palmitate, thiamin mononitrate, pyridoxine hydrochloride, cupric oxide, riboflavin, chromium chloride, biotin, potassium iodide, sodium molybdate, sodium selenite, vitamin k-1, folic acid, vitamin d3, cyanocobalamin), less than 1% of: nonfat dry milk, glycerol*, butter, natural & artificial flavors, stabilizer (mono & diglycerides, cellulose gum, carrageenan, xanthan gum, maltodextrin), salt, ascorbic acid (vitamin c), probiotic cultures (bifidobacterium, l. acidophilus, l. paracasei), caramel color, sodium bicarbonate, sucralose, acesulfame potassium, eggs.. Evidence quality: medium

73/100

nutrition score

Empty

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

nutrition profile is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Nutrition profileWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

63/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

73/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

64/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Mr. Beverages Old Time Cocktail Mixes Protein Bar

Empty. Ingredients: Protein blend (whey protein isolate, milk protein isolate), isomalto-oligosaccharides* (prebiotic fiber), almonds, water. contains less than 2% of the following: freeze dried strawberries, freeze dried blueberries, sea salt, lo han guo, sucralose, natural flavors.. Evidence quality: medium

65/100

nutrition score

Empty

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

nutrition profile is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Nutrition profileWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

65/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

65/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

64/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Signal classes

Supporting factors

Fiber (8 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (2 markers) support a more processed classification.
Formulation markers such as karamellvärv, guarkummi support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (31 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryEmpty

Label information quality64/100

Data confidence

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

100

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Energy / 100g

130 kcal

Protein / 100g

6 g

Sugar / 100g

7 g

Nutrition score71/100 · Grade B

Ingredient-level explanation

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 71/100

Quite good

nutrition profile is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Nutrition profile

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Data confidence 63/100

Medium reliability

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

71/100

Nutrition score based on nutrient profile only.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

64/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Fiber (8 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (2 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
Formulation markers such as karamellvärv, guarkummi support a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Record completeness is 56%.
Impact: medium
Image evidence covers about 0% of the key fields.
Impact: low

Some source data is incomplete for this product: quantity and front image. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Fresh & Easy Hot & Spicy Chicken Chunks

67/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

79/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

67/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

80/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Quest Nutrition Llc Protein Bar

76/100

nutrition score

Balanced nutritionEmpty

Score summary

Nutrition score

Strong

nutrition profile is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Nutrition profileWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

71/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

Strong

76/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

66/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Thrive Frozen Nutrition Inc Ice Cream

73/100

nutrition score

Empty

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

nutrition profile is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Nutrition profileWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

63/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

73/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

64/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Mr. Beverages Old Time Cocktail Mixes Protein Bar

65/100

nutrition score

Empty

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

nutrition profile is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Nutrition profileWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

65/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

65/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

64/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Enlightened Enlightened Light Salted caramel cookie

Nutrient profile

Supporting factors

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 71/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Fresh & Easy Hot & Spicy Chicken Chunks

Quest Nutrition Llc Protein Bar

Thrive Frozen Nutrition Inc Ice Cream

Mr. Beverages Old Time Cocktail Mixes Protein Bar

Enlightened Enlightened Light Salted caramel cookie

Nutrient profile

Supporting factors

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 71/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Fresh & Easy Hot & Spicy Chicken Chunks

Quest Nutrition Llc Protein Bar

Thrive Frozen Nutrition Inc Ice Cream

Mr. Beverages Old Time Cocktail Mixes Protein Bar

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs