Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
64
/100
Nutrition interpretation
Moderate signal
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Energy / 100g
533 kcal
Protein / 100g
16.67 g
Sugar / 100g
6.67 g
Ingredient-level explanation
Rice crackers (glutinous rice, soy sauce (wheat, soybean, water, and salt), sugar, starch, sesame seed, seaweed, chill, fd&c yellow # 5 & #6), walnuts, almonds, filberts, green peas (salt , vegetable oil,salt, potato flour, powders.
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
64
/100
Nutrition profile
processing is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Processing
Weakest area
Environmental signal
Data confidence
low
Data confidence
Data confidence 42/100
Low reliability
Data coverage is limited and the result should be interpreted with caution.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.
Nutrition profile
Quite good
64/100
64
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Moderately processed
Moderately processed · Limited estimate
67
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
57
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Mixed
58/100
58
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
Data is limited. The result should be treated as an initial indication rather than a final assessment.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Fiber (6.7 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (43 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Record completeness is 22%.
Impact: medium
The processing indicator is inferred rather than declared directly.
Impact: low
Image evidence covers about 0% of the key fields.
Impact: low
Teatud sünteetilised värvained on seotud tähelepanu-riskisignaaliga, eriti laste kontekstis.
Kohe
Mõnel lapsel võib esineda aktiivsuse või tähelepanu muutust.
Pikemas vaates
Tõendus on kontekstipõhine; signaal aitab hinnata koostise profiili ega tähenda automaatselt kahjulikku toimet kõigile.
Loogika: Koostises või additiivides leidub E102, E104, E110, E122, E124, E129 (vajadusel koos E211).
Signaalid: Leitud sünteetiliste värvainete koodid: E102.
See on ettevaatlik kontekstisignaal. Mõju sõltub tundlikkusest, kogusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
Värvainete signaal tähendab, et tootes on lisandeid, mida osa vanemaid soovib laste puhul teadlikult piirata.
Miks oluline
Rakendus ei ütle, et mõju tekib kindlasti, vaid annab rahuliku märguande, kui soovid lapse menüüs neid koode jälgida.
Kohe
Mõnel lapsel võib tähelepanu või aktiivsuse muster ajutiselt muutuda.
Pikemas vaates
Pikema aja vaates aitab see signaal hoida lapse menüüd lisandiprofiili poolest lihtsamana.
Põhineb piiratud, kuid regulatiivselt arvestatud tõendusel teatud värvainete ja laste käitumiskonteksti seoste kohta.
Signaalid: Leitud sünteetiliste värvainete koodid: E102.