Need attention
- Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
What would improve the assessment
- Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.



Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
9
/100
Nutrition interpretation
High signal
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
bibi Ceptiona go come "mix", rmony ith conv sa mod dish, B spoon, stone y raditi st in Ko e world ve're sha Korea rom world pital, Kon E Energy Protein per serving Quantity per 100g 2660 K (T.+65-6888-1888) 140 KJ LESS THAN 10 Fat, total 2.7g - saturated LESS THAN 1 19.29 53.19 479 Carbohydrate 1.1 g 21.8g - sugars LESS THAN 10 LESS THAN 10 50 mg 920 mg Sodium INGREDIENTS: Seaweed 53.1% (Pyropia yezoensis), Canola oil, Sesame oil 9.6%, Salt CONTAINS SESAME. PRODUCED IN A FACILITY THAT ALSO USES SOYBEAN, WHEAT, EGG, MILK Manufactured by CJ Seafood Corp. Imported by in Singapore: NTUC FAIRPRICE CO-OPERATIVE LIMITED NO.1 JOO KOON CIRCLE, LEVEL 13-01, SINGAPORE 629117 in Australia: KOREA FOOD PTY. LTD. BUILDING B, 12LOYALTY RD. NORTH ROCKS NSW 2151 Australia (T.+61-2-9630-1937)/1/3-5 Graham Rd. Clayton VIC 3169 Australia (T.+61-3-9548-0392) in Newzealand: E MART CO.LTD, 21 Foremans Road, Islington, Christchurch 8042, New Zealand (T. 64-3-344-6036) in Malaysia: LH Sales & Marketing Sdn. Bhd. Lot PT 1756, Jalan Persiaran KIP Utama, Taman Perindustrian Kip, 52200 Kepong, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (T.60-3-6286-8686) Avoid direct sunlight and keep in cool place. Best before printed on the package(DD.MM.YYYY) Caution: This product contains silica gel packet to in freshness, do not eat. Korea CRISPY SEN
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
9
/100
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Nutrition profile
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
Data confidence 77/100
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The result points to clear risk and low quality.
Nutrition profile
Very weak
9/100
9
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Moderately processed
Moderately processed · Limited estimate
67
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
Quite good
72/100
72
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
81/100
81
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
A long ingredient list (58 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Related products

Plant-based. Ingredients: Pommes de terre* (57,7%), huile de tournesol * (35%), fécule de pommes de terre*, sel, paprika* (1,7%), tomate*, oignon*, ail*.. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
55
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
91/100
high reliability
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

Plant-based. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
73
Nutrition score
environmental signal is the strongest signal right now, while label quality needs the most caution.
Data confidence
72/100
medium reliability

Plant-based. Ingredients: Baies de Goji.. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
45
Nutrition score
processing is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Data confidence
88/100
high reliability

Plant-based. Ingredients: Baies de canneberge BIO, Jus de canne évaporé BIO, Huile de tournesol BIO (- de 1%). Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
44
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
87/100
high reliability
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage