Lickfoods Cashew Spread Chive · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Lickfoods Cashew Spread Chive

Name: Lickfoods Cashew Spread Chive
Brand: Lickfoods
SKU: 0712392419871

The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition interpretation

Moderate signal

The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives More from Lickfoods Suggest correction

Signal classes

Supporting factors

Fiber (3.3 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.

Need attention

High sodium content (700 mg/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.

Supporting factors

Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.

Need attention

A long ingredient list (13 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryFats

Label information quality70/100

Data confidence

Ownership

Processing

Moderately processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 2

Performance

Energy / 100g

300 kcal

Protein / 100g

10 g

Sugar / 100g

3.33 g

Nutrition score55/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Cashews*, water, chive, onion powder*, himalayan salt, cultures

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 55/100

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Nutrition profile

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Data confidence 63/100

Medium reliability

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.

Nutrition profile

Mixed

55/100

Nutrition score based on nutrient profile only.

Processing

Moderately processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

70/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Fiber (3.3 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

High sodium content (700 mg/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (13 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Record completeness is 56%.
Impact: medium
Image evidence covers about 0% of the key fields.
Impact: low

Some source data is incomplete for this product: quantity and front image. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Del Arte Huile pimentée

Fats. Ingredients: Huile de tournesol, huile extra vierge d'olive (30%), piment (2%), ail, (Romarin, feuilles de laurier, herbes aromatiques en quantités variables (thym, origan, coriandre), tabasco, arômes naturels.. Evidence quality: high

65/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

85/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

65/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

83/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Bingoil Mélange d'huile vegetale

Fats. Ingredients: Huile végétale, huile de grignons d'olive raffinée, huile "live extra vierge, arôme (d'extrait de plante). Peut antenir des traces d'arachides Peut contenir de l'huile végétale produite a parir de semences génétiquement modifiées; A anservera l'abri de la chaleur et de la lumière.. Evidence quality: high

64/100

nutrition score

Strong evidence coverageFats

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

85/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

64/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

74/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Oliversion Huile d’olive

Fats. Evidence quality: high

64/100

nutrition score

Lower processing burdenStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

processing is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.

Strongest: ProcessingWeakest: Environmental signal

Data confidence

80/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

64/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Moderately processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

67/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Food Ingredients Lipifluid Arôme Naturel Beurre - 300 ML

Fats. Ingredients: Conditionné dans un système de pulvérisation à l'azote, ce procédé préserve naturellement les valeurs gustatives et nutritionnelles de votre Lipifluid@. Fonctionne dans toutes les positions grâce à son système anti-goutte breveté, il permet également de maîtriser la quantité et d'utiliser la juste dose. Composition : Huiles raffinées de tournesol et tournesol oléique, lécithine de colza, arôme naturel beurre. Conseils d'utilisation : Apporter par brèves pulvérisations, une note beurre à vos préparations, telles que ; légumes, pâtes, purées, riz... Pour poêler et rissoler pulvériser directement sur le support de cuisson. Pulverisation de 5 secondes = 11g de Lipifluid.. Evidence quality: medium

65/100

nutrition score

Fats

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

69/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

65/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

67/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Signal classes

Supporting factors

Fiber (3.3 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.

Need attention

High sodium content (700 mg/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.

Supporting factors

Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.

Need attention

A long ingredient list (13 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryFats

Label information quality70/100

Data confidence

Ownership

Processing

Moderately processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 2

Performance

Energy / 100g

300 kcal

Protein / 100g

10 g

Sugar / 100g

3.33 g

Nutrition score55/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Cashews*, water, chive, onion powder*, himalayan salt, cultures

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 55/100

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Nutrition profile

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Data confidence 63/100

Medium reliability

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.

Nutrition profile

Mixed

55/100

Nutrition score based on nutrient profile only.

Processing

Moderately processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

70/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Fiber (3.3 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

High sodium content (700 mg/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (13 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Record completeness is 56%.
Impact: medium
Image evidence covers about 0% of the key fields.
Impact: low

Some source data is incomplete for this product: quantity and front image. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Del Arte Huile pimentée

65/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

85/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

65/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

83/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Bingoil Mélange d'huile vegetale

64/100

nutrition score

Strong evidence coverageFats

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

85/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

64/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

74/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Oliversion Huile d’olive

Fats. Evidence quality: high

64/100

nutrition score

Lower processing burdenStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

processing is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.

Strongest: ProcessingWeakest: Environmental signal

Data confidence

80/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

64/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Moderately processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

67/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Food Ingredients Lipifluid Arôme Naturel Beurre - 300 ML

65/100

nutrition score

Fats

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

69/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

65/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

67/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Lickfoods Cashew Spread Chive

Nutrient profile

Supporting factors

Need attention

Processing level

Supporting factors

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 55/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Del Arte Huile pimentée

Bingoil Mélange d'huile vegetale

Oliversion Huile d’olive

Food Ingredients Lipifluid Arôme Naturel Beurre - 300 ML

Lickfoods Cashew Spread Chive

Nutrient profile

Supporting factors

Need attention

Processing level

Supporting factors

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 55/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Del Arte Huile pimentée

Bingoil Mélange d'huile vegetale

Oliversion Huile d’olive

Food Ingredients Lipifluid Arôme Naturel Beurre - 300 ML

What lowers the rating

Kõrge soolasisaldus

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Kõrge soolasisaldus lapse menüüs