Search catalog

M&S Collection Mini Mince Pies · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:High signal

M&S Collection Mini Mince Pies

Name: M&S Collection Mini Mince Pies
Brand: M&S Collection
SKU: 00960328

The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.

Nutri-ScoreENOVA4

Lisaained:7 tk

Andmete katvus:89%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (2 markers) support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (96 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition score27/100 · Grade E

Ingredient-level explanation

Mincemeat (Sultanas, Glucose-Fructose Syrup, Apple Purée, Vostizza Currants, Sugar, Glacé Cherries (Cherries, Glucose-Fructose Syrup, Sugar, Natural Colour: Anthocyanins (from Black Carrots) , Acidity Regulator: Citric Acid), Cranberries, Concentrated Clementine Juice, Rapeseed Oil , Raisins, Cornflour ,Mixed Peel (Orange Peel, Glucose-Fructose Syrup, Lemon Peel, Sugar, Acidity Regulator: Citric Acid), Cognac , Brandy, Humectant: Glycerol Cider, Ground Spices (Cinnamon, Nutmeg, Black Pepper), Preservative: Acetic Acid, Black Treacle, Acidity Regulator: Citric Acid, Gelling Agent: Pectin (from Fruit), Orange Oil, Antioxidant: Ascorbic Acid), Wheatflour contains Gluten (with Wheatflour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), Unsalted Butter (Milk) Sugar, Wildfarmed Wheatflour contains Gluten (with Wheatflour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), Wheat Semolina (contains Gluten), Dextrose, Salt, Raising Agent: E450, Sodium Bicarbonate, Cornflour, Shea Oil, Caramelised sugar

Tuvastatud lisaained (7)

E163 E260 E300 E330 E440 E450 E500

Product & Packaging

CategoryFood

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity246g

PackagingPlastique, Carton, en:card-box, en:foil-tray, en:pet-tray

OriginsTurkey,Greece

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Nutrition score

27/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 27/100

Weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.

Nutrition profile

Weak

27/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (2 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (96 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, and nutrition panel. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Fazer

Geisha Chocolate Eggs

Food. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreEFood

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

JDC

Kūčiukai lietuviški

Food. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreEFood

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Fazer

Candy calendar

Food. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreEPlant-based

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

javinė

Kūčiukai

Food. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreEFood

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (2 markers) support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (96 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition score27/100 · Grade E

Ingredient-level explanation

Tuvastatud lisaained (7)

E163 E260 E300 E330 E440 E450 E500

Product & Packaging

CategoryFood

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity246g

PackagingPlastique, Carton, en:card-box, en:foil-tray, en:pet-tray

OriginsTurkey,Greece

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Nutrition score

27/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 27/100

Weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.

Nutrition profile

Weak

27/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (2 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (96 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

M&S Collection Mini Mince Pies

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 27/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Geisha Chocolate Eggs

Kūčiukai lietuviški

Candy calendar

Kūčiukai

M&S Collection Mini Mince Pies

Similar options worth comparing

Geisha Chocolate Eggs

Kūčiukai lietuviški

Candy calendar

Kūčiukai

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 27/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Environmental Impact

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs