Indomie Indomie Shrimp Noodles · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Indomie Indomie Shrimp Noodles

Name: Indomie Indomie Shrimp Noodles
Brand: Indomie
SKU: 0089686120110

The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition interpretation

Moderate signal

The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives More from Indomie Suggest correction

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Formulation markers such as naatriumglutamaat (E621), guarkummi (E412) support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (34 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryAliments D Origine Vegetale

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity70 gr

OriginsIndonésie

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

100

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition score55/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Of soft wheat, palm oil (94.0%), salt, Stabilizers: asium carbonate (E501i), sodium polyphosphate (E500i), Thickener: V(E412), Dye: B2 anüoxidant: TBHQ (E319). Salt, seasoning (5.6%) flavor enhancer (E621), yeast extract aroma, garlic powder, chili (0.4%).

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 55/100

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

Data confidence 85/100

High reliability

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.

Nutrition profile

Mixed

55/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Quite good

72/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Formulation markers such as naatriumglutamaat (E621), guarkummi (E412) support a more processed classification.
Impact: low
A long ingredient list (34 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, and nutrition panel. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Pouce Boules de maïs au miel

Aliments D Origine Vegetale. Ingredients: Semoule de maïs 64%, sucre, miel 3%, sirop de glucose, huile de tournesol, sel, sirop de caramel (sucre, eau). Traces éventuelles de gluten, d'arachides, de fruits à coque, de lait, de soja et de graines de sésame.. Evidence quality: high

40/100

nutrition score

Strong evidence coverageAliments D Origine Vegetale

Score summary

Nutrition score

Weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

83/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Weak

40/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Quite good

72/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

74/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Carrefour Plumas ralladas al huevo

Aliments D Origine Vegetale. Ingredients: Sémola de trigo duro de calidad superior, huevo en polvo rehidratado (16,6%). Evidence quality: high

78/100

nutrition score

Balanced nutritionLower processing burden

Score summary

Nutrition score

Strong

processing is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.

Strongest: ProcessingWeakest: Environmental signal

Data confidence

78/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Strong

78/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Minimally processed

100

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Quite good

72/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

85/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Carrefour Letras de patata

Aliments D Origine Vegetale. Ingredients: Patata 87%, aceite de girasol 6%, harina de arroz, patata deshidratada, sal, estabilizante: hidroxipropilmetilcelulosa, dextrosa, cúrcuma. Evidence quality: high

62/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

87/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

62/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Quite good

72/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

92/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Céréalpes 4 galettes au SON d'AVOINE Nature

Aliments D Origine Vegetale. Ingredients: Eau, son davoine* 26,1%, blanc d’œuf en poudre*, lait écrémé en poudre*, poudre levante*, sel marin.. Evidence quality: high

71/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

90/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

71/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Quite good

66/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

93/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Formulation markers such as naatriumglutamaat (E621), guarkummi (E412) support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (34 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryAliments D Origine Vegetale

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity70 gr

OriginsIndonésie

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

100

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition score55/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 55/100

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

Data confidence 85/100

High reliability

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.

Nutrition profile

Mixed

55/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Quite good

72/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Formulation markers such as naatriumglutamaat (E621), guarkummi (E412) support a more processed classification.
Impact: low
A long ingredient list (34 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Similar options worth comparing

Pouce Boules de maïs au miel

40/100

nutrition score

Strong evidence coverageAliments D Origine Vegetale

Score summary

Nutrition score

Weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

83/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Weak

40/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Quite good

72/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

74/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Carrefour Plumas ralladas al huevo

Aliments D Origine Vegetale. Ingredients: Sémola de trigo duro de calidad superior, huevo en polvo rehidratado (16,6%). Evidence quality: high

78/100

nutrition score

Balanced nutritionLower processing burden

Score summary

Nutrition score

Strong

processing is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.

Strongest: ProcessingWeakest: Environmental signal

Data confidence

78/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Strong

78/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Minimally processed

100

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Quite good

72/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

85/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Carrefour Letras de patata

62/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

87/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

62/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Quite good

72/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

92/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Céréalpes 4 galettes au SON d'AVOINE Nature

Aliments D Origine Vegetale. Ingredients: Eau, son davoine* 26,1%, blanc d’œuf en poudre*, lait écrémé en poudre*, poudre levante*, sel marin.. Evidence quality: high

71/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

90/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

71/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Quite good

66/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

93/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Indomie Indomie Shrimp Noodles

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 55/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Pouce Boules de maïs au miel

Carrefour Plumas ralladas al huevo

Carrefour Letras de patata

Céréalpes 4 galettes au SON d'AVOINE Nature

Indomie Indomie Shrimp Noodles

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 55/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Pouce Boules de maïs au miel

Carrefour Plumas ralladas al huevo

Carrefour Letras de patata

Céréalpes 4 galettes au SON d'AVOINE Nature

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs