The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products
Kedainiu Konservai
Snacks. Ingredients: Salted mushrooms (mushrooms, salt), water, onions, tomato paste, rapeseed oil, salt, sugar, garlic, spices.. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Kedainiu Konservai
Snacks. Ingredients: Tomatoes, water, onions, sugar, salt, sourness regulating substance: acetic acid, spices.. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Mt. Olive
Snacks. Ingredients: Cucumbers, high fructose corn syrup, water, vinegar, salt, mustard seeds, onion flakes, calcium chloride, 0.1% sodium benzoate (preservative), celery seeds, and yellow 5.. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Mt. Olive
Snacks. Ingredients: Banana peppers, onions, high fructose corn syrup, water, vinegar, salt, mustard seeds, calcium chloride, 0.1% sodium benzoate (preservative), celery seeds, natural flavors, polysorbate 80, sodium bisulfite (preservative), and yellow 5.. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Contains: olives, garlic, water, sea salt, vinegar.
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Category breakdown
The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.
Nutrition profile
Weak
38/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Highly processed
Highly processed
Highly processed
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Quite good
71/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
No clear positive highlights emerged from the available data.
Impact: low
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
