The Spice Hunter Organic Mild Taco Seasoning Mix · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

The Spice Hunter Organic Mild Taco Seasoning Mix packshot

Nutrition snapshot

The Spice Hunter Organic Mild Taco Seasoning Mix

Name: The Spice Hunter Organic Mild Taco Seasoning Mix
Brand: The Spice Hunter
SKU: 0081057053331

The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition interpretation

Moderate signal

The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives More from The Spice Hunter Suggest correction

Signal classes

Supporting factors

Fiber (23.3 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.

Need attention

High sugar content (23.255813953488 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
High sodium content (4651 mg/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.

Supporting factors

Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.

Need attention

A long ingredient list (21 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Uncertain or missing data

The processing indicator is inferred rather than declared directly.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryFood

Label information quality70/100

Data confidence

Ownership

Processing

Moderately processed · Limited estimate

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 2

Performance

Energy / 100g

348.83720930233 kcal

Protein / 100g

0 g

Sugar / 100g

23.255813953488 g

Nutrition score47/100 · Grade D

Ingredient-level explanation

Organic onion, organic garlic, organic rice starch, organic paprika, sea salt, organic chile pepper, organic cane sugar, organic cumin, citric acid.

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 47/100

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Nutrition profile

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Data confidence 62/100

Medium reliability

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.

Nutrition profile

Mixed

47/100

Nutrition score based on nutrient profile only.

Processing

Moderately processed

Moderately processed · Limited estimate

Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

70/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Fiber (23.3 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

High sugar content (23.255813953488 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: high
High sodium content (4651 mg/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium

Uncertain area

Record completeness is 44%.
Impact: medium
The processing indicator is inferred rather than declared directly.
Impact: low

Some source data is incomplete for this product: quantity, category, and allergens. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Signal classes

Supporting factors

Fiber (23.3 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.

Need attention

High sugar content (23.255813953488 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
High sodium content (4651 mg/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.

Supporting factors

Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.

Need attention

A long ingredient list (21 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Uncertain or missing data

The processing indicator is inferred rather than declared directly.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryFood

Label information quality70/100

Data confidence

Ownership

Processing

Moderately processed · Limited estimate

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 2

Performance

Energy / 100g

348.83720930233 kcal

Protein / 100g

0 g

Sugar / 100g

23.255813953488 g

Nutrition score47/100 · Grade D

Ingredient-level explanation

Organic onion, organic garlic, organic rice starch, organic paprika, sea salt, organic chile pepper, organic cane sugar, organic cumin, citric acid.

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 47/100

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Nutrition profile

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Data confidence 62/100

Medium reliability

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.

Nutrition profile

Mixed

47/100

Nutrition score based on nutrient profile only.

Processing

Moderately processed

Moderately processed · Limited estimate

Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

70/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Fiber (23.3 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

High sugar content (23.255813953488 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: high
High sodium content (4651 mg/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium

Uncertain area

Record completeness is 44%.
Impact: medium
The processing indicator is inferred rather than declared directly.
Impact: low

Some source data is incomplete for this product: quantity, category, and allergens. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

The Spice Hunter Organic Mild Taco Seasoning Mix

Nutrient profile

Supporting factors

Need attention

Processing level

Supporting factors

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

What would improve the assessment

Label quality

Need attention

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 47/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

The Spice Hunter Organic Mild Taco Seasoning Mix

Nutrient profile

Supporting factors

Need attention

Processing level

Supporting factors

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

What would improve the assessment

Label quality

Need attention

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 47/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

What lowers the rating

Kõrge vabade suhkrute sisaldus

Kõrge soolasisaldus

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Kõrge soolasisaldus lapse menüüs

Kõrge vabade suhkrute sisaldus lapse toidus