Herkuless
Herkuless homemade pancakes
Cooking Helpers. Evidence quality: high
Nutri-ScoreCStrong evidence coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products
Herkuless
Cooking Helpers. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Rimi
Cooking Helpers. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Duncan Hines
Cooking Helpers. Ingredients: Degermed yellow corn meal, enriched wheat flour (wheat flour, niacin, reduced iron, thiamine mononitrate, riboflavin, folic acid), sugar, leavening (sodium bicarbonate, sodium aluminum phosphate, monocalcium phosphate), salt. Contains: wheat.. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Lohilo
Cooking Helpers. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Energy / 100g
357 kcal
Protein / 100g
10.7 g
Sugar / 100g
7.14 g
Ingredient-level explanation
PANKO JAPANESE STYLE BREAD CRUMBS (ENRICHED WHEAT FLOUR [NIACIN, RESUCED IRON, THIAMONE MONONITRATE, RIBOFLAVIN, FOLIC ACID], DEXTEOSE, SUGAR, YEAST, SALT)
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Category breakdown
The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.
Nutrition profile
Quite good
69/100
Nutrition score based on nutrient profile only.
Processing
Highly processed
Highly processed
Highly processed
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
83/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Fiber (3.57 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Protein (10.7 g/100 g) provides limited support to the nutrition score.
Impact: low
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (20 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Record completeness is 67%.
Impact: medium
Töödeldud lihatooted ja nitriti/nitraadi markerid viitavad kõrgema ettevaatuse vajadusele.
Kohe
Võib suurendada soola- ja säilitusainete koormust ühes toidukorras.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsatele pikaajalistele tervisenäitajatele.
Loogika: Kategooria viitab töödeldud lihale või koostises/additiivides leidub E249, E250, E251, E252.
Signaalid: Koostises tuvastati markerid: nitraat.
See signaal ei asenda personaalset nõustamist. Tõlgendus sõltub tarbimissagedusest ja portsjoni suurusest.
Kui toode kuulub töödeldud liha profiili, kuvame selle vanemale pika vaate hariva märkusena.
Miks oluline
Sõnum on praktiline: sellised valikud sobivad pigem harvemaks, eriti kui lapsel koguneb menüüs palju soolaseid töödeldud tooteid.
Kohe
Võib kaasneda suurem janu ja soolakoormus samal päeval.
Pikemas vaates
Sage kasutus võib vähendada lapse menüü üldist toitumiskvaliteeti.
Põhineb IARC pikaajalise riski käsitlusel töödeldud lihatoodete kohta ning toitaineprofiili kontekstil.
Signaalid: Koostises tuvastati markerid: nitraat.