Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
24
/100
Nutrition interpretation
High signal
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
CHOCOLAT AU LAIT 39 % (SUCRE, PÂTE DE CACAO, BEURRE DE CACAO, LAIT ENTIER EN POUDRE, LAIT ÉCRÉMÉ EN POUDRE, ÉMULSIFIANT LÉCITHINES DE SOJA), NOISETTES 27 % DANS LA CRÈME FOURRÉE, SUCRE, HUILE DE COPRAH, LACTOSÉRUM EN POUDRE (LAIT), FARINE DE FROMENT, LAIT ÉCRÉMÉ EN POUDRE, EXTRAIT DE MALTE D’ORGE, CRÈME EN POUDRE (LAIT), CACAO MAIGRE, ÉMULSIFIANT LÉCITHINES DE SOJA, POUDRE À LEVER (CARBONATE ACIDE DE SODIUM, DIPHOSPHATE DISODIQUE), SEL, FARINE DE SOJA, GOUSSE DE VANILLE BOURBON, ÉPICES. PEUT CONTENIR DES AMANDES.
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
24
/100
Nutrition profile
processing is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Processing
Weakest area
Nutrition profile
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Data confidence 75/100
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The result points to clear risk and low quality.
Nutrition profile
Very weak
24/100
24
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Moderately processed
Moderately processed · Limited estimate
67
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
57
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Quite good
66/100
66
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Pulls the score down
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (23 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.