Herkuless
Herkuless homemade pancakes
Cooking Helpers. Evidence quality: high
Nutri-ScoreCStrong evidence coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products
Herkuless
Cooking Helpers. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Rimi
Cooking Helpers. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Duncan Hines
Cooking Helpers. Ingredients: Degermed yellow corn meal, enriched wheat flour (wheat flour, niacin, reduced iron, thiamine mononitrate, riboflavin, folic acid), sugar, leavening (sodium bicarbonate, sodium aluminum phosphate, monocalcium phosphate), salt. Contains: wheat.. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Lohilo
Cooking Helpers. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Energy / 100g
0 kcal
Protein / 100g
0 g
Sugar / 100g
0 g
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
processing is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Processing
Weakest area
Nutrition profile
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Category breakdown
The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.
Nutrition profile
Mixed
55/100
Nutrition score based on nutrient profile only.
Processing
Minimally processed
Minimally processed
Minimally processed
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Quite good
70/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 1 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
High sodium content (2667 mg/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
Uncertain area
Record completeness is 56%.
Impact: medium
Image evidence covers about 0% of the key fields.
Impact: low
Kõrge soolasisaldus viitab suuremale naatriumikoormusele, mida tasub igapäevases tarbimises piirata.
Kohe
Võib suurendada janu ja mõnel inimesel soodustada vedelikupeetust.
Pikemas vaates
Sage liigne soolatarbimine seostub kõrgema vererõhu riskiga.
Loogika: salt100g > 1.2 g/100 g.
Signaalid: Sool 6.7 g/100 g ületab lävendi 1.2 g/100 g.
Tegu on riskisignaaliga, mitte meditsiinilise hinnanguga. Oluline on kogu päeva soolakoormus.
Kui soola on palju, suunab rakendus vanema tähelepanu lapse päevase soolakoormuse ja maitseharjumuste kujunemisele.
Miks oluline
Lapse toitumises tasub väga soolaseid valikuid piirata, sest harjumused kujunevad varakult ja mõjutavad ka hilisemat eelistust.
Kohe
Võib tekkida tugevam janu ja soov juua rohkem.
Pikemas vaates
Võib toetada soolasema maitse eelistust ja ebasoodsat vererõhu riskisuunda.
Põhineb tugeval rahvusvahelisel juhisel: WHO naatriumisoovitused (lastel kohandatakse vajadus allapoole).
Signaalid: Sool 6.7 g/100 g ületab lävendi 1.2 g/100 g.