La Preferida Lard · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

La Preferida Lard

Name: La Preferida Lard
Brand: La Preferida
SKU: 0071524010134

The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition interpretation

High signal

The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives More from La Preferida Suggest correction

Signal classes

Need attention

High saturated fat (46.15 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Supporting factors

Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.

Need attention

Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.

Need attention

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).

Supporting factors

Declared Eco-Score B supports the environmental indicator.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryFats

Label information quality63/100

Data confidence

Ownership

Processing

Moderately processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 2

Performance

Energy / 100g

923 kcal

Protein / 100g

0 g

Nutrition score36/100 · Grade E

Ingredient-level explanation

Lard and hydrogenated lard. bha, propyl gallate and citric acid added to protect flavor.

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 36/100

Weak

environmental signal is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Environmental signal

Weakest area

Nutrition profile

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Data confidence 67/100

Medium reliability

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.

Nutrition profile

Weak

36/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Moderately processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Strong

80/100

Product-specific environmental signal.

Label quality

Quite good

63/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Declared Eco-Score B supports the environmental indicator.
Impact: high
Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high

Pulls the score down

High saturated fat (46.15 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium

Uncertain area

Record completeness is 56%.
Impact: medium
Image evidence covers about 0% of the key fields.
Impact: low

Some source data is incomplete for this product: sugars per 100g, fiber per 100g, quantity, allergens, and front image. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Del Arte Huile pimentée

Fats. Ingredients: Huile de tournesol, huile extra vierge d'olive (30%), piment (2%), ail, (Romarin, feuilles de laurier, herbes aromatiques en quantités variables (thym, origan, coriandre), tabasco, arômes naturels.. Evidence quality: high

65/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

85/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

65/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

83/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Bingoil Mélange d'huile vegetale

Fats. Ingredients: Huile végétale, huile de grignons d'olive raffinée, huile "live extra vierge, arôme (d'extrait de plante). Peut antenir des traces d'arachides Peut contenir de l'huile végétale produite a parir de semences génétiquement modifiées; A anservera l'abri de la chaleur et de la lumière.. Evidence quality: high

64/100

nutrition score

Strong evidence coverageFats

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

85/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

64/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

74/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Oliversion Huile d’olive

Fats. Evidence quality: high

64/100

nutrition score

Lower processing burdenStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

processing is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.

Strongest: ProcessingWeakest: Environmental signal

Data confidence

80/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

64/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Moderately processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

67/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Food Ingredients Lipifluid Arôme Naturel Beurre - 300 ML

Fats. Ingredients: Conditionné dans un système de pulvérisation à l'azote, ce procédé préserve naturellement les valeurs gustatives et nutritionnelles de votre Lipifluid@. Fonctionne dans toutes les positions grâce à son système anti-goutte breveté, il permet également de maîtriser la quantité et d'utiliser la juste dose. Composition : Huiles raffinées de tournesol et tournesol oléique, lécithine de colza, arôme naturel beurre. Conseils d'utilisation : Apporter par brèves pulvérisations, une note beurre à vos préparations, telles que ; légumes, pâtes, purées, riz... Pour poêler et rissoler pulvériser directement sur le support de cuisson. Pulverisation de 5 secondes = 11g de Lipifluid.. Evidence quality: medium

65/100

nutrition score

Fats

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

69/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

65/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

67/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Signal classes

Need attention

High saturated fat (46.15 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Supporting factors

Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.

Need attention

Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.

Need attention

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).

Supporting factors

Declared Eco-Score B supports the environmental indicator.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryFats

Label information quality63/100

Data confidence

Ownership

Processing

Moderately processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 2

Performance

Energy / 100g

923 kcal

Protein / 100g

0 g

Nutrition score36/100 · Grade E

Ingredient-level explanation

Lard and hydrogenated lard. bha, propyl gallate and citric acid added to protect flavor.

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 36/100

Weak

environmental signal is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Environmental signal

Weakest area

Nutrition profile

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Data confidence 67/100

Medium reliability

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.

Nutrition profile

Weak

36/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Moderately processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Strong

80/100

Product-specific environmental signal.

Label quality

Quite good

63/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Declared Eco-Score B supports the environmental indicator.
Impact: high
Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high

Pulls the score down

High saturated fat (46.15 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium

Uncertain area

Record completeness is 56%.
Impact: medium
Image evidence covers about 0% of the key fields.
Impact: low

Similar options worth comparing

Del Arte Huile pimentée

65/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

85/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

65/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

83/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Bingoil Mélange d'huile vegetale

64/100

nutrition score

Strong evidence coverageFats

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

85/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

64/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

74/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Oliversion Huile d’olive

Fats. Evidence quality: high

64/100

nutrition score

Lower processing burdenStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

processing is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.

Strongest: ProcessingWeakest: Environmental signal

Data confidence

80/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

64/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Moderately processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

67/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Food Ingredients Lipifluid Arôme Naturel Beurre - 300 ML

65/100

nutrition score

Fats

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

69/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

65/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

67/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

La Preferida Lard

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Supporting factors

Need attention

Label quality

Need attention

Environmental signal

Supporting factors

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 36/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Del Arte Huile pimentée

Bingoil Mélange d'huile vegetale

Oliversion Huile d’olive

Food Ingredients Lipifluid Arôme Naturel Beurre - 300 ML

La Preferida Lard

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Supporting factors

Need attention

Label quality

Need attention

Environmental signal

Supporting factors

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 36/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Del Arte Huile pimentée

Bingoil Mélange d'huile vegetale

Oliversion Huile d’olive

Food Ingredients Lipifluid Arôme Naturel Beurre - 300 ML

What lowers the rating

Kõrge küllastunud rasva sisaldus

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Kõrge küllastunud rasva taustsignaal