Open Food Facts
4740093942509
Snacks. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
Snacks
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products
Open Food Facts
Snacks. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Mio & rio
Snacks. Ingredients: Nenugriebtas PIENAS (ne mažiau kaip bku [LT] Sokoladinis plombyras su šokolado gabaliukais vafliniame bia 49 %), cukrus, SVIESTAS, vanduo, vaflinis puodelis (7,7 %) (KVIETINIAI miltai, Dkukurūzų krakmolas, augaliniai riebalai (rapsy), SOJŲ baltymų koncentratas, emulsiklis SOJŲ lecitinai, tešlos kildymo medžiaga natrio karbonatai, druska, cukrus), šokolado gabaliukai (3 %) (cukrus, kakavos mase, kakavos Sviestas", emulsiklis SOJŲ lecitinai), gliukozės sirupas, kakavos milteliai (2.2 %), nugriebto PIENO milteliai, ISRUGU milteliai (iš PIENO), emulsiklis riebalų rūgščių mono - ir digliceridai, stabilizatoriai (saldžiųjų ceratonijų derva, pupenių derva, karageninas), kvapioji medžiaga. Kakavos sausuju medžiagų šokolade ne mažiau kaip 40 %. Gali būti RIEŠUTŲ ir ZEMES RIEŠUTU pedsaky.. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Minimelts
Snacks. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Gelatelli
Snacks. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
sugar, rice flour, water, pasteurized egg whites, corn syrup, wheat flour, beet juice as color.
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Category breakdown
The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.
Nutrition profile
Weak
38/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Highly processed
Highly processed
Highly processed
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
85/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (16 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.