Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
69
/100
Nutrition interpretation
Moderate signal
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Energy / 100g
127 kcal
Protein / 100g
3.33 g
Ingredient-level explanation
water, rice, potato starch, lactic acid, barley amylase,
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
69
/100
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
Data confidence 78/100
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.
Nutrition profile
Quite good
69/100
69
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Highly processed
Highly processed
34
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
57
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
78/100
78
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
Record completeness is 67%.
Impact: medium
Related products
Grains. Ingredients: Noodle: water, rice, potato starch, lactic acid, amylase. sauce: sugar, water, tomato, soy sauce (water, salt, soybean), onion, lemon, chili pepper paste (red chili pepper, salt), acetic acid, rice vinegar, spice, corn maltodextrin, lemongrass, modified corn starch, fish sauce (anchovy, water, salt, sugar), garlic, sea salt, citric acid, caramel color, malic acid, xanthan gum, yeast extract. dehydrated vegetables: bok choy, carrot, red bell pepper. topping: peanut.. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
65
Nutrition score
nutrition profile is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
67/100
medium reliability
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Grains. Ingredients: Water, rice, potato starch, lactic acid, amylase. sauce: sugar, water, soy sauce (water, salt, soybean), onion, garlic, spices (including red pepper), corn maltodextrin, pickled radish (radish, salt, water), soybean oil, modified corn starch, lemon, lemongrass, tamarind paste (tartaric acid, succinic acid, malic acid, tamarind seed gum, pectin), citric acid, xanthan gum, caramel color, yeast extract. dehydrated vegetables: bok choy, carrots, red bell pepper. topping: toasted sesame seed.. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
64
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
63/100
medium reliability
Grains. Ingredients: Organic jasmine red rice, organic thai brown rice, organic tapioca flour, water.. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
67
Nutrition score
nutrition profile is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
63/100
medium reliability
Grains. Ingredients: SEASONED SALT, ALLSPIŒ, ANISE, CINNAMON, CUCUMBER, CARROT, CUNTRO. WATER, CORNSTARCH, CELLULOSE GEL. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
69
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
85/100
high reliability
Madal kiudainesisaldus ja rafineeritud süsivesikud viitavad toidule, mis toetab nõrgemalt täiskõhutunnet.
Kohe
Võib põhjustada kiiremat glükoosikõikumist ja varasemat näljatunnet.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine võib halvendada üldist toidukvaliteeti ja seostub ebasoodsama ainevahetusprofiiliga.
Loogika: fiber100g < 1.5 g/100 g või fiber100g < 3 g/100 g koos rafineeritud süsivesikute markeritega.
Signaalid: Kiudained 0.7 g/100 g jäävad alla üldlävendi 3 g/100 g. · Kiudainesisaldus jääb alla tugeva riskisignaali lävendi 1.5 g/100 g.
Riskisignaal sõltub kogu menüü kiudainete tasemest, mitte ainult ühest tootest.
Madal kiudainesisaldus on lapse vaates oluline, sest see mõjutab nii täiskõhutunnet kui ka seedimise mugavust.
Miks oluline
Rakendus kuvab selle, et aidata vanemal hoida lapse menüüs rohkem täistera, kaunvilju, puu- ja köögivilju.
Kohe
Võimalik on kiirem näljatunde taastumine või raskem seedimine.
Pikemas vaates
Võib vähendada lapse menüü üldist kvaliteeti ja hoida kiudainete tarbimise püsivalt liiga madalal.
Põhineb tugeval rahvusvahelisel juhisel: WHO süsivesikute kvaliteedi ja kiudainete soovitused.
Signaalid: Kiudained 0.7 g/100 g jäävad alla üldlävendi 3 g/100 g. · Kiudainesisaldus jääb alla tugevama alamsignaali lävendi 1.5 g/100 g.
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage