The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products
Dare
Craquelin. Ingredients: FARINE DE BLÉ, GERME DE BLÉ, HUILE DE COPRA, HUILE DE CANOLA, FARINE DE BLÉ ENTIER, SUCRE, SEL, SUBSTANCES LAITIÈRES MODIFIÉES, HUILE D’OLIVE, BICARBONATE D’AMMONIUM, PROTÉINES DE SOYA HYDROLYSÉES, BICARBONATE DE SOUDE, BASILIC, PROTÉASE, PENTOSANASE, TBHQ, ACIDE CITRIQUE, ARÔME NATUREL.. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
WHEAT FLOUR, SHORTENING (VEGETABLE, MODIFIED PALM), DRIED VEGETABLE AND SEASONING BLEND (CARROT, DEXTROSE, ONION, SALT, WHEAT FLOUR, CELERY, CABBAGE, RED BELL PEPPER, SUGAR, PARSLEY, MONOSODIUM GLUTAMATE, HYDROLYZED WHEAT PROTEIN, TURMERIC EXTRACT, VEGETABLE OIL, NATURAL FLAVOUR), SUGAR, AMMONIUM BICARBONATE, SALT, GLUCOSE-FRUCTOSE, MONOCALCIUM PHOSPHATE, BAKING SODA, HYDROLYZED SOY PROTEIN, AMYLASE, PROTEASE. CONTAINS: WHEAT, SOY.
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Category breakdown
The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.
Nutrition profile
Weak
44/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Very highly processed
Very highly processed
Very highly processed
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
88/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (2 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
Formulation markers such as kurkuma, naatriumglutamaat support a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
NOVA 4 viitab ulatuslikule tööstuslikule töötlemisele ja suuremale formulatsiooni keerukusele.
Kohe
Võib soodustada ülesöömist, sest maitse- ja tekstuuriprofiil on sageli väga stimuleeriv.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsatele tervisetulemitele, kuid mõju sõltub toitumismustrist.
Loogika: novaGroup === 4.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud klass).
NOVA klass on tarbimismustri signaal ega tähenda üksiku toote põhjal automaatset diagnoosi.
Ultra-töödeldud märge aitab vanemal hinnata, kas toode sobib igapäevaseks valikuks või pigem harvemaks.
Miks oluline
Rakendus kuvab selle lisakontekstina, et toetada lapse menüü üldist kvaliteeti, mitte anda mustvalget otsust ühe toote kohta.
Kohe
Võib tekkida kiire söömise ja varasema uue isu muster.
Pikemas vaates
Sage kasutus võib nihutada menüüd vähem täisväärtusliku toiduprofiili poole.
Põhineb peamiselt epidemioloogilisel ja institutsionaalsel kirjandusel ultra-töödeldud toitude tarbimismustrite kohta.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud profiil).
