The Hain Celestial Group Inc. Mexican Veggie Ground Round · Nutrisiq

The Hain Celestial Group Inc. Mexican Veggie Ground Round packshot

Nutrition snapshot

The Hain Celestial Group Inc. Mexican Veggie Ground Round

Name: The Hain Celestial Group Inc. Mexican Veggie Ground Round
Brand: The Hain Celestial Group Inc.
SKU: 0060822800028

The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition interpretation

Low signal

The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives More from The Hain Celestial Group Inc.Suggest correction

Signal classes

Supporting factors

Fiber (5.45 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.
Protein (16.4 g/100 g) provides limited support to the nutrition score.

Need attention

High sodium content (491 mg/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (44 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategorySans Viande Hache

Label information quality79/100

Data confidence

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Energy / 100g

145 kcal

Protein / 100g

16.4 g

Sugar / 100g

1.82 g

Nutrition score73/100 · Grade B

Ingredient-level explanation

Water, textured soy protein, onions, spices, expeller pressed canola oil, natural flavors (contain torula & autolyzed yeast), sea salt, evaporated cane syrup, barley malt, tapioca starch, extractives of spice & garlic, vitamins & minerals (wheat starch, ferrous fumarate, zinc oxide, niacinamide, cyanocobalamin, calcium pantothenate, thiamine hydrochloride, pyridoxine hydrochloride, riboflavin).

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 73/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

Data confidence 82/100

High reliability

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

73/100

Nutrition score based on nutrient profile only.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

79/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Fiber (5.45 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Protein (16.4 g/100 g) provides limited support to the nutrition score.
Impact: low

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
High sodium content (491 mg/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (44 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Record completeness is 78%.
Impact: medium

Some source data is incomplete for this product: quantity. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Signal classes

Supporting factors

Fiber (5.45 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.
Protein (16.4 g/100 g) provides limited support to the nutrition score.

Need attention

High sodium content (491 mg/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (44 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategorySans Viande Hache

Label information quality79/100

Data confidence

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Energy / 100g

145 kcal

Protein / 100g

16.4 g

Sugar / 100g

1.82 g

Nutrition score73/100 · Grade B

Ingredient-level explanation

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 73/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

Data confidence 82/100

High reliability

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

73/100

Nutrition score based on nutrient profile only.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

79/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Fiber (5.45 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Protein (16.4 g/100 g) provides limited support to the nutrition score.
Impact: low

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
High sodium content (491 mg/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (44 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Record completeness is 78%.
Impact: medium

Some source data is incomplete for this product: quantity. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

The Hain Celestial Group Inc. Mexican Veggie Ground Round

Nutrient profile

Supporting factors

Need attention

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 73/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

The Hain Celestial Group Inc. Mexican Veggie Ground Round

Nutrient profile

Supporting factors

Need attention

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 73/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

What lowers the rating

Kõrge soolasisaldus

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Kõrge soolasisaldus lapse menüüs

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs