Search catalog

Spring Tree Maple Syrup · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:High signal

Spring Tree Maple Syrup

Name: Spring Tree Maple Syrup
Brand: Spring Tree
SKU: 0039059729846

The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.

Nutri-ScoreENOVA2

Lisaained:0 lisaainet

Andmete katvus:73%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

Uncertain or missing data

Fruit, vegetable, legume, and nut share was inferred heuristically.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Supporting factors

Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.

Need attention

A long ingredient list (14 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Uncertain or missing data

The processing indicator is inferred rather than declared directly.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition score38/100 · Grade E

Ingredient-level explanation

nutrition facts serving size 1/4 cup (60 ml) servings per container about 6 amount per serving calories 210 % daily value* total fat 0g sodium 10mg potassium 170mg total carbohydrate 53g sugars 53g %0 %0 100% pure protein 0g aple syrup calcium 8% grade a mber color rich taste not a significant source of calories from fat, saturated fat, trans fat, cholesterol, dietary fiber, vitamin a, vitamin c and iron, *percent daily values are based on a 2,000 calorie diet, refrigerate

Product & Packaging

CategorySweeteners

Label information quality74/100

Data confidence

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Moderately processed · Limited estimate

Formulation complexity

NOVA groupNOVA 2

Nutrition score

38/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 38/100

Weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Nutrition profile

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Medium reliability

medium5/5 kontrollitud

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.

Nutrition profile

Weak

38/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Moderately processed

Moderately processed · Limited estimate

Moderately processed

Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

74/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high

Pulls the score down

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (14 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, quantity, nutrition panel, and allergens. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Open Food Facts

6420396004217

Sweeteners. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden

Sweeteners

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Open Food Facts

6420396004231

Sweeteners. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden

Sweeteners

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Nordicsugar.dk

4770074522956

Sweeteners. Ingredients: Økologisk rørsukker.. Evidence quality: high. Nutrition score is currently hidden

NOVA2Lower processing burden

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Xylimax

Xylimax Mints Menthol & Mint

Sweeteners. Ingredients: Sweetener (xylitol (incl. xylitol from oats)) 94%, firming agents (E470a, E466), thickener (E414), natural flavourings, glazing agent (E903). Excessive consumption may produce laxative effects. Gluten free.. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

Uncertain or missing data

Fruit, vegetable, legume, and nut share was inferred heuristically.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Supporting factors

Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.

Need attention

A long ingredient list (14 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Uncertain or missing data

The processing indicator is inferred rather than declared directly.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition score38/100 · Grade E

Ingredient-level explanation

Product & Packaging

CategorySweeteners

Label information quality74/100

Data confidence

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Moderately processed · Limited estimate

Formulation complexity

NOVA groupNOVA 2

Nutrition score

38/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 38/100

Weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Nutrition profile

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Medium reliability

medium5/5 kontrollitud

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.

Nutrition profile

Weak

38/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Moderately processed

Moderately processed · Limited estimate

Moderately processed

Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

74/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high

Pulls the score down

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (14 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Spring Tree Maple Syrup

Nutrient profile

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Supporting factors

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

What would improve the assessment

Label quality

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 38/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

6420396004217

6420396004231

4770074522956

Xylimax Mints Menthol & Mint

Spring Tree Maple Syrup

Similar options worth comparing

6420396004217

6420396004231

4770074522956

Xylimax Mints Menthol & Mint

Nutrient profile

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Supporting factors

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

What would improve the assessment

Label quality

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 38/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Environmental Impact

What lowers the rating

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid