Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
67
/100
Nutrition interpretation
Moderate signal
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Energy / 100g
136 kcal
Protein / 100g
13.64 g
Sugar / 100g
0 g
Ingredient-level explanation
Eggs (processed in citric acid and sodium benzoate)
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
67
/100
Nutrition profile
processing is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Processing
Weakest area
Environmental signal
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Data confidence 63/100
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.
Nutrition profile
Quite good
67/100
67
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Minimally processed
Minimally processed
100
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Weak
35/100
35
Product-specific environmental signal.
Label quality
Quite good
70/100
70
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared Eco-Score D supports the environmental indicator.
Impact: high
Declared NOVA group 1 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
No significant negative factors emerged from the available data.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Record completeness is 56%.
Impact: medium
Image evidence covers about 0% of the key fields.
Impact: low
Fruit, vegetable, legume, and nut share was inferred heuristically.
Impact: low
Related products
Food. Ingredients: Oeufs de poules élevées en plein air. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
75
Nutrition score
processing is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
90/100
high reliability
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Food. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
75
Nutrition score
nutrition profile is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
77/100
high reliability
Food. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
75
Nutrition score
nutrition profile is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
80/100
high reliability
Food. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
nutrition score
Score summary
—
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
59/100
medium reliability
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage