Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
49
/100
Nutrition interpretation
Moderate signal
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Energy / 100g
375 kcal
Protein / 100g
0 g
Sugar / 100g
87.5 g
Ingredient-level explanation
Organic coconut palm sugar
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
49
/100
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Nutrition profile
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
Data confidence 84/100
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.
Nutrition profile
Mixed
49/100
49
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Moderately processed
Moderately processed
67
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Mixed
51/100
51
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
93/100
93
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Fruit, vegetable, legume, and nut content (100%) supports the nutrition score.
Impact: low
Pulls the score down
High sugar content (87.5 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: high
Uncertain area
Record completeness is 89%.
Impact: medium
Fruit, vegetable, legume, and nut share was inferred heuristically.
Impact: low
Related products
Sweeteners. Ingredients: 100% poudre de xylitol. Evidence quality: high. Nutrition score is currently hidden
nutrition score
Score summary
—
Nutrition score
processing is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
84/100
high reliability
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Sweeteners. Ingredients: sucre Muscovado.. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
38
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Data confidence
85/100
high reliability
Sweeteners. Ingredients: Sucre d'écorce de bouleau. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
nutrition score
Score summary
—
Nutrition score
processing is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
73/100
medium reliability
Sweeteners. Ingredients: Cristaux blancs de xylitol extrait d'écorces de bouleau de Finlande.. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
nutrition score
Score summary
—
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
71/100
medium reliability
Kõrge vabade suhkrute sisaldus võib tõsta energiakoormust ilma püsivat täiskõhutunnet pakkumata.
Kohe
Võib tekitada kiire energiakõikumise ning varasema näljatunde või suurema janu.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsale kehakaalu ja ainevahetuse profiilile.
Loogika: Joogid: sugars100g > 5 g/100 ml. Toidud: sugars100g > 10 g/100 g.
Signaalid: Suhkur 87.5 g/100 g ületab toidule rakendatud lävendi 10 g/100 g.
See on riskisignaal, mitte diagnoos. Mõju sõltub kogusest, tarbimissagedusest ja kogu toitumismustrist.
Kui toidus on palju vabu suhkruid, võib see lapse puhul nõrgendada täiskõhutunnet ja toetada sagedamat magusaisu.
Miks oluline
Rakendus tõstab selle esile, sest laste toitumises mõjutab sage kõrge suhkrukoormus nii päevast söömismustrit kui ka hambatervise riski.
Kohe
Võib tekkida varasem uus näljatunne või suurem janu pärast magusat toidukorda.
Pikemas vaates
Võib kujundada magusamaid maitse-eelistusi ja vähendada menüü üldist toitumiskvaliteeti.
Põhineb tugeval rahvusvahelisel juhisel: WHO soovitab lastel piirata vabu suhkruid (kaariese ja liigse energiatarbimise riskisuund).
Signaalid: Suhkur 87.5 g/100 g ületab toidule rakendatud lävendi 10 g/100 g.
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage